Radiation Benefit and Risk Assessment

ثبت نشده
چکیده

How much radiation does it take to cause our risk for an observable health effect to increase? Is there a level of radiation that is safe? How is radiation beneficial? The question of an effect occurring because of radiation exposure and the question of whether low‐ level radiation is safe are much‐debated topics. There are many thoughts on the answers to these questions, and suggested answers lie along a continuum, especially when the topic is low‐level radiation. Answers range from " radiation is good for you " (this is the hormesis hypothesis) to " low levels of radiation are safe " (they do not measurably increase your risk of disease) to " any amount of radiation exposure carries some risk " (this is the linear no‐threshold hypothesis). According to the American Cancer Society, the average natural incidence of cancer in the United States is 42 percent (42 out of 100 people will get cancer in their lifetime). Diagnostic medical radiation exposures may or may not increase this risk. It is important to note that radiation exposure does not create a unique cancer risk situation, nor is the risk directly measurable or distinguishable from the cancer risk caused by other sources (environmental, chemical, biological, etc.). When we discuss radiation risks, the effects are probabilistic in nature—like the odds of getting a heads when we flip a coin. First, we lack the scientific data to determine a precise risk of cancer in the future from radiation exposure today, but we estimate the increase in the cancer incidence rate is about 0.17 percent per rem of radiation dose; this is based on the effects we see with high doses. However, it is impossible to say with certainty that any single person will get a radiation‐induced cancer. Second, it may be impossible to even demonstrate that additional cancers have occurred, since the normal incident rate of cancer is about 42 percent plus or minus some natural variation. What this means is that out of a group of 100 people, it is estimated that about 42 will get a cancer in their lifetime. If we expose each of them to one rem of radiation, still about 42 out of 100 will get a cancer in their lifetime. If we expose each to five rem of radiation, we estimate now that about 43 out of 100 will get a cancer in their lifetime. What we cannot …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Health Risk Assessment of Natural Background Radiation in Residents of Khorramabad, Iran

Introduction Radioactive materials naturally exist in the world. Indeed, approximately 82% of human-absorbed radiation doses, which are out of human control, arise from natural sources of radiation including cosmic, terrestrial, and exposure through inhalation or ingestion. Thus, the aim of the present study was to estimate health risk, as well as the effective and organ doses from naturally oc...

متن کامل

Excess Cancer Risk Assessment from Some Common X-Ray Examinations in Sabzevar County

Introduction: Nowadays ionizing radiation has a considerable contribution in medical diagnostic and treatment. Using ionizing radiation is increasing rapidly, so biological effects of ionizing radiation should be considered more. X-rays in the range of diagnostic radiology have hazardous effects and risks that are defined as random effects. These effects obey the LNT hypothesis that occur at lo...

متن کامل

Assessment of radiation-induced cancer risk to patients undergoing computed tomography angiography scans

Background: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan is a suitable imaging technique to evaluate the blood vessels. However, one major disadvantage is the potential risk of cancer related to ionizing radiation exposure during the procedures. The aim of this investigation was to estimate the risk of exposure induced cancer death (REID) values for some common computed tomography angiography (CT...

متن کامل

مبانی فلسفی سود و زیان در پژوهش های پزشکی

In medical etiquette and ethics, benefit and harm assessment includes risk evaluation, rational risk, distinction between medical and non medical utilitarian considerations, individual and community benefit ratio, and issues of the like. This article explores philosophical foundations of this issue. In philosophy, benefit/harm reduces to pleasure/pain and good/bad. Pleasure (spiritual and non-...

متن کامل

Cancer Risk Assessment due to Accidental Exposure inside Neutron Laboratories using BEIR VII Model

Introduction: Environmental and occupational human exposure from neutron source can lead to the serious biologic effects. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cancer incidence risk for various human organs at different neutron dose levels due to exposure from an Americium-241/Beryllium (Am-241/Be), a standard neutron source for calibration purposes. Material and Methods: We measured ambient...

متن کامل

Assessment of Abarkouh Region to Construct Solar Sites

In recent decades, due to increasing prices of fossil fuels and environmental pollution resulting from the increased energy demand, researches on renewable energy sources have attracted lots of researcher’s attention. Limited investing sources and environmental issues are important factors effecting electricity generation sector. Minimizing costs and environmental damages are issues being consi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008